Existence: How do you define existence? Do you cease to exist (if we really do exist) once you're dead or is it independent of physical things?
Great existentialists have pondered these questions for many many years now. One’s existence depends on how one perceives the world to be. I have held numerous conversations with people, who felt like they didn’t exist simply because they weren’t at the level they wanted or needed to be, or life’s journey has taken them on a different course than they had plan; either way existence isn’t a word that should be taken lightly.
Socrates, one of the great philosophers believed that the value or quality of one's life depends on understanding the principles of, or basic rationale for human existence; he believed that one’s life would lack virtue. So in order to fully grasp the term, one would need to understand what it means to exist. If I were to say, the Queen is hungry or the Queen is walking, it may be news to those not in the Queen's presence, whereas ‘the Queen exists’ would be news to no one who knew her, and merely puzzling to anyone who did not. The reality of it all is, we as human beings know what it is like to be hungry or to walk, but what we’re unsure of is, what is it like to exist, how does the experience feels? Saying i am hungry or I am walking is an action that can be easily emulated by anyone who’s physical condition will allow them to feel those things but one’s existence isn’t something we can indicate to anyone.
Now, I assure that I will not quote all the great philosophers that I have read about but I must say, most of the opinions from the great philosophers are very different from one another. Aquinas, Hume, Kant, Plato, and Socrates, they each offered a different outlook on that word and it’s very fascinating as you dig deep into the topic.
In "Origin of Negation", my main man Sartre tried to posit the beginning of human existence from a new post-enlightenment perspective (God is Dead we could say). What he thought was that existence pervaded wherever nothingness was not perceived. The idea of existence might now be so easily definable though. We could take the idea on step further into nothingness, and try to decide if existence is really a negation of nothingness, or merely a facet of nothingness which perception moulds to exist at a certain time and place.
So do we exist even after we’re gone? I’d like to think that we do simply because I feel like all of the things we learned or passed on to other people, even after we’re gone, they remain on this earth. So physically you’re gone yet the lessons, the advices, the things that we did while on this planet will never leave and that to me is still part of one’s existence.
So how do one define existence? It’s all subjective my friends. But I hope by reading this, you can begin to dig deep within and come up with your own definition of ‘existence’ and possibly you can come to grips with what it means to exist.
Mr Prodg.
2021-2022 Season Finale
-
*What's That Growling Noise?*
The WORD wonders. That growling noise could be his stomach. Maybe it’s the
backhoe digging up the front yard. Or, more like...
2 years ago
Some individuals who claim they haven't lived until their desires, wants, or cravings have been met are likely to be emotionally deceased for an awfully long time, if not indefinitely. It leaves a person at constant odds with just being complete or fulfilled with themselves at the present moment if they haven't came to terms with not gaining the foot hold they set out to place in their respective society over time. It may be unpleasant reality for a time, but it is a reality. It is existence. To me a person who comes to the conclusion they haven't lived unless they've done this activity or gone somewhere leaves themselves in an unfortunate social predicament especially if they haven't arrived at the financial or social status to apprehend these ideals. Unfortunate because some people or most have a proclivity to arrive at erroneous, depressing insights about themselves if certain things aren't taking place at certain times in their lives in the manner they have envisioned. A near flawless logic in an environment that procures and harbors abstract thinking like an academia doesn't fare well in the fumbles and storms of practical life... Emotion too many times hurries the chariot of reason to jump to haste to making fallacious choices like if I fail a standardized test that most are doing well at, I am stupid or I have no chance of getting accepted at this college. IQ tests function to calibrate the intellectual aptitude of children and subject children to the subtle messages that they aren’t endowed with the ability to stick it out with the best and brightest minds. Right then and there, they stunt mental growth and the potential of so many to be exceptional assets to their communities. Some of us fail at moments of great emotional disappointment to take into account the options or variety of factors that played a role in our very current failing. Some reflect on it as if it representative of a great picture of our mental capacity being below par to the average student. We even go to the extent with some external pressures from some strange media voices and familiar family echoes to think we aren't made for scholarly pursuit or cut for this field or this lifestyle or a general style. Our failing a last attempt that they admonished would not bode our existence well somehow verified for us without Socratic review that their suspicions were right. It could have been a point to learn from, but to some, it was the end, especially if it was a recurring defect. This isn't the end. How easily some can call to mind a will to give up, not try again, to admit the worse of themselves because of a singular mistake or an extenuated shortcoming that resonates in the dome. Reason like this is pretty faulty, because it presupposes that it is or it isn't. It's black or white. It's happy or sad. It's good or bad. It does this again without much critical thinking, because humans are sensitive naturally to any occasion that provides an opportunity to defame or slander a person's pride or worth. Others would conclude at our youth that a child that didn’t do good in classes was stupid, yet this same stupid youth was lyrically superior to the memorizers of texts. Children failed to gather that life isn’t that simple. That dichotomy isn’t a constant of figuring things out. Some grew to still carry this ineffectual backward view of others and are also prey to this limited perspective of existence. He’s either a fool and wise man. Some failed to witness the dimensions and spectrums of human experience and in an eagerness to contextualize very quickly the perceived world, a gross simplification of the adjectives we could add to what really is was made – a conundrum, an enigma... a collaboration of the oh so visible and recurrent bad and the humdrum, uncelebrated good times that pale in comparison.
ReplyDeleteSome saw an existence worth having was only a good existence and nothing short of that. Unless we can break from that mentality. We can never truly live.
I definitely agree with you Toute...i think too many times we wait on society to define 'us' rather than us defining ourselves through our journey through life.
ReplyDeleteMy usual ironic realization is I understand this problem, but I still have trouble breaking from these self-assessments mirrored from standards. There is more a person can pull from your writing on existence, but we can talk about this aspect of subjective view and interpretations of truly existing... which Socrates thought was "living the examined life" would lead to ultimate happiness.
ReplyDeleteDo you really think that with so many people trying to avoid truth or any sign of a semblance of truth? Didn't they kill the guy for pointing out what he interpreted as the truth about the people of Athens?
So what does Socrates mean by that the "unexamined life is not worth living" with so many trying to exist in the most idyllic, carefree, and comfortable circumstances? Truth is without suffering, I'm afraid.
Although... we do sometimes need the judgments of others to reevaluate our behaviors if they are what I deem them to be. My only issue with this is that so many take it as a point, to first be on the defensive or doubtful, to be remorseful if they finally see the fault, invest in that self-pity for a huge amount of time, then they pick up, but forget very easily their fault and continue it, until someone points it out again or they have assumed the fault as something natural to their being and learn to accept it at least clandestinely at first.
- Toute
Toute
ReplyDeleteLike Plato wrote in the Apology (pick that up), “the unexamined life is not worth living,” and that’s exactly how I see it. We must all go outside of our comfort zone and try things that are perceived to be abnormal. I respect a man who goes out there and try things just out of curiosity instead of staying his hole and wonders what it feels like out of it.
Have you ever heard of the expression “know yourself”? to some, this might mean that one should know their place or maybe status quo. Yet Socrates saw this totally different; in the apology Plato explained this story how Socrates went on a search for the man who was the wisest in Athens; he ended up finding a lot of wise guys but they were wise only in their particular field. So he concluded by saying that only God was wise because only he knew everything; ‘know yourself’ to a certain means that one should be comfortable enough with oneself and be able to say, yes I know this and at the same time proudly say it when you’re unsure of something.
As for needing the approval of others, I think it only applies to certain situations. I think in life we must try to let our individuality shine as often as we can so we can remain sane.
Anytime I need to reasure myself that I exist, I try to see how long I can hold my breath. Invariable, something requires me start breathing again. I conclude that there is something more powerful than my 'will'. I than conclude that being aware of that 'something' means I exist. Now the hard part starts: Why, where, and how do I exist?
ReplyDeleteWhy, where, and how do i exist??? wow, those are some tough questions and to be honest they're somewhat personal.
ReplyDeleteThere's physical existence and mental existence. Have you heard the saying, 'he's a shadow of him or herself'? well, thats bc to the outsider, this person is no longer acting or living as he or she used to. so physically, that person is non-existent.
A couple of yrs ago when Michael Jordan made his return to the game, he said, 'my body can longer do the things my mind tells it to do'. So on the bball court, he was mentally there yet physically his body was longer capable of producing the jordan of old.